Live AVM report - values update over time.

Automated valuation model report

Nov 12th, 2026 (2026-11-12)

Property information (estimated)

These details are our best estimate. If you have additional information or updates that disagree with what we show, you can change it on the property page and the valuation will update to match.
Address155 Riverside Close SE
LocationCalgary, Alberta, Canada
Coordinates50.975613, -114.028046
Interior Size1810 ft² (168 m²)
Property TypeHouse
Bedrooms3
Den0
Full Bathrooms3
Half Bathrooms1
Year Built1989
Property

Valuation estimates

Estimated list price

$745,384

Confidence95.0%

Estimated sale price

$746,778

Confidence94.3%

Estimated monthly rent

$3,000

Confidence93.9%

Price trend

Our estimated list and sale price for this property over the past 18 months. Each point is a model estimate of value for that month, based on the property as it is today, not a recorded sale.

Chart smoothed using Whittaker-Eilers method $730,000 $735,000 $740,000 $745,000 $750,000 $755,000 $760,000 May '25 Jul '25 Sep '25 Nov '25 Jan '26 Mar '26 May '26 Jul '26 Sep '26 Nov '26 List price Sale price
Download CSV
Chart smoothed using Whittaker-Eilers method $2,850 $2,900 $2,950 $3,000 May '25 Jul '25 Sep '25 Nov '25 Jan '26 Mar '26 May '26 Jul '26 Sep '26 Nov '26 Monthly rent
Download CSV

Flags

Our system did not find any warnings or flags for this property.

Model configuration & statisticsHow these models are built and validated

Sale price model

Training R-squared0.950
Testing R-squared0.910
Mean Absolute Error$67,500
RMSE$286,436
MAPE10.2%
Median MAPE5.7%
Within 5%45.8%
Within 10%73.2%
Within 15%85.4%
Within 20%91.7%
Mean Bias-$9,652
Median Bias-$988
Over-prediction Rate49.0%
Under-prediction Rate51.0%
10th Percentile Error$5,041
25th Percentile Error$12,724
50th Percentile Error$28,462
75th Percentile Error$58,170
90th Percentile Error$115,548
95th Percentile Error$188,691
10th Percentile % Error1.0%
90th Percentile % Error18.2%
Forecast Std Dev$286,274
Coefficient of Variation45.401

List price model

Training R-squared0.990
Testing R-squared0.940
Mean Absolute Error$59,226
RMSE$219,986
MAPE8.3%
Median MAPE5.0%
Within 5%50.0%
Within 10%77.6%
Within 15%89.3%
Within 20%94.4%
Mean Bias-$8,764
Median Bias$496
Over-prediction Rate50.6%
Under-prediction Rate49.4%
10th Percentile Error$4,142
25th Percentile Error$10,785
50th Percentile Error$25,437
75th Percentile Error$53,379
90th Percentile Error$106,661
95th Percentile Error$183,244
10th Percentile % Error0.9%
90th Percentile % Error15.4%
Forecast Std Dev$219,811
Coefficient of Variation34.374

Rental price model

Training R-squared0.840
Testing R-squared0.700
Mean Absolute Error$318
RMSE$681
MAPE10.6%
Median MAPE6.1%
Within 5%42.4%
Within 10%68.6%
Within 15%82.1%
Within 20%89.1%
Mean Bias-$41
Median Bias-$4
Over-prediction Rate49.3%
Under-prediction Rate50.7%
10th Percentile Error$29
25th Percentile Error$75
50th Percentile Error$168
75th Percentile Error$336
90th Percentile Error$648
95th Percentile Error$1,060
10th Percentile % Error1.1%
90th Percentile % Error21.0%
Forecast Std Dev$679
Coefficient of Variation23.273

Property scores and risk indicators

Scored 1 to 10. Higher is better.
7/10 (71%)Above average overall.

Natural hazards

CategoryScoreRating
▸Flood9/10Strong

A rating from 0 to 10 of how often the area around a property floods, where higher numbers mean the surrounding area floods less often. It reflects the area, not the individual home.

A low score does not always mean this home will flood. It might sit on higher ground and stay dry, but a nearby flood plain can still affect it a great deal, because flooding damages surrounding roads, utilities, and services and drags on value and insurance across the whole area. Use a low score as a prompt to look into whether this particular home is genuinely at risk.

  • 0-2: Very high flood exposure - The surrounding area floods readily
  • 3-4: High flood exposure - The area sees significant flooding
  • 5-6: Moderate flood safety - Some flood-prone conditions nearby
  • 7-8: High flood safety - The area floods only rarely
  • 9-10: Very high flood safety - The surrounding area is very unlikely to flood

In Canada this is the worse of Natural Resources Canada's flood susceptibility and the Joint Research Centre's river flood depths for floods of 20, 100 and 500 years.

▸Fire8/10Strong

A score measuring fire safety in the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating lower fire hazard.

This score helps residents and property seekers understand the fire-related risks associated with a specific location, considering factors that could impact property safety, insurance, and emergency preparedness.

  • 0-2: Very High Hazard - Extreme fire vulnerability
  • 3-4: High Hazard - Significant fire risk
  • 5-6: Moderate Safety - Some fire danger factors
  • 7-8: High Safety - Rare fire occurrence potential
  • 9-10: Very High Safety - Minimal fire concerns

In Canada this is the worse of the land burned since 1985 in the Canadian Landsat disturbance maps and the forest fuel of the SCANFI maps around the home, both 30 m across.

▸Earthquake9/10Strong

A score measuring earthquake safety in the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating lower seismic hazard.

This score helps residents and property seekers understand the geological risks associated with a specific location, considering factors that could impact property safety and insurance.

  • 0-2: Very High Hazard - Extreme earthquake vulnerability
  • 3-4: High Hazard - Significant seismic risk
  • 5-6: Moderate Safety - Some earthquake potential
  • 7-8: High Safety - Rare seismic activity
  • 9-10: Very High Safety - Minimal earthquake concerns

In Canada this is the peak ground acceleration with a 2 percent chance in 50 years of the National Building Code's 2020 seismic hazard at the nearest of its localities, on a fixed ladder from under 0.05 g scoring 10 to 0.90 g or more scoring 0.

▸Hurricane10/10Strong

A score measuring hurricane safety in the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating lower hurricane hazard.

This score helps residents and property seekers understand the hurricane-related risks associated with a specific location, considering factors that could impact property safety, insurance, and emergency preparedness.

  • 0-2: Very High Hazard - Extreme hurricane vulnerability
  • 3-4: High Hazard - Significant hurricane risk
  • 5-6: Moderate Safety - Some hurricane potential
  • 7-8: High Safety - Rare hurricane occurrence
  • 9-10: Very High Safety - Minimal hurricane concerns

In Canada this is the North Atlantic storm tracks since 1976 of the international best track archive. The interior and the Pacific coast score 10.

▸Tornado8/10Strong

A score measuring tornado safety in the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating lower tornado hazard.

This score helps residents and property seekers understand the tornado-related risks associated with a specific location, considering factors that could impact property safety, insurance, and emergency preparedness.

  • 0-2: Very High Hazard - Extreme tornado vulnerability
  • 3-4: High Hazard - Significant tornado risk
  • 5-6: Moderate Safety - Some tornado potential
  • 7-8: High Safety - Rare tornado occurrence
  • 9-10: Very High Safety - Minimal tornado concerns

In Canada this is the verified touchdowns of 1980 to 2009 in the National Tornado Database, scored by rating from 0 for F5 to 5 for F0. British Columbia, Atlantic Canada and the far north score 10.

▸Air quality6/10Average

A comprehensive score measuring the air quality in the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating cleaner, healthier air.

This score helps residents and property seekers understand the environmental health of a specific location, considering factors that impact breathing and overall well-being.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Significant air pollution concerns
  • 3-4: Poor - Noticeable air quality issues
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some air quality limitations
  • 7-8: Good - Clean and healthy air conditions
  • 9-10: Excellent - Pristine air quality with minimal pollutants

In Canada this is the mean PM2.5 of the National Air Pollution Surveillance stations over the years each measured, on a fixed ladder: under 5 micrograms per cubic metre scores 10, 5 to 8 scores 8, 8 to 12 scores 6, 12 to 20 scores 4, 20 to 35 scores 2 and more scores 0. Homes far from any station take a score from their population density.

▸Water quality8/10Strong

A score for the overall quality of local surface water (rivers, lakes, streams), ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating cleaner waterways.

This score measures the freshwater you actually swim in, fish in, or live next to, not literally tap water. Buyers care about it for recreational water use, property value next to clean water, contamination risk to private wells, and the overall environmental health of the area.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Significant local surface water issues
  • 3-4: Poor - Notable water quality pressures
  • 5-6: Marginal - Mixed conditions
  • 7-8: Fair to Good - Clean local surface water
  • 9-10: Excellent - Pristine local surface water

In Canada this is the Canadian Water Quality Index of Environment and Climate Change Canada's monitoring stations, which weighs measures such as dissolved oxygen, pH, ammonia, nitrate, phosphorus and metals against their guidelines: 95 or more scores 10, 80 scores 9, 65 scores 7, 45 scores 5 and less scores 2.

Location quality

CategoryScoreRating
▸Walkability6/10Average

A comprehensive score measuring how easy and pleasant it is to walk around the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more pedestrian-friendly environments.

This score helps residents and visitors understand the walkability of a location, considering how connected its streets are, how many homes are near and how many shops and destinations are within walking distance.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Almost impossible to walk
  • 3-4: Poor - Significant walking challenges
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some walkable areas
  • 7-8: Good - Very pedestrian-friendly
  • 9-10: Excellent - Perfect for walking everywhere

In Canada this ranks the index of the Canadian Active Living Environments database for each dissemination area.

▸Transit3/10Concerning

A comprehensive score measuring the quality and accessibility of public transportation in the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more extensive and convenient transit options.

This score helps residents and commuters understand the public transportation landscape of a location, considering factors like transit variety, service frequency, and overall ease of getting around without a personal vehicle.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Almost no public transit
  • 3-4: Poor - Limited transportation options
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some transit availability
  • 7-8: Good - Reliable public transportation
  • 9-10: Excellent - Exceptional transit network

In Canada this ranks the transit index of the Canadian Active Living Environments database for each dissemination area.

▸Bicycle7/10Strong

A comprehensive score measuring how bicycle-friendly an area is, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating better conditions for cycling.

This score helps residents and property seekers understand the cycling potential of a location, considering factors like bike lanes, safety, and overall cycling infrastructure.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Extremely challenging for cyclists
  • 3-4: Poor - Limited bicycle infrastructure
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some cycling opportunities
  • 7-8: Good - Strong support for cyclists
  • 9-10: Excellent - Ideal for cycling enthusiasts
▸Safety8/10Strong

A comprehensive score measuring the safety of the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating a safer, more secure neighborhood.

This score helps residents and property seekers understand the overall safety profile of a specific location, considering various factors that contribute to community security.

  • 0-2: Very High Risk - Significant safety concerns
  • 3-4: High Risk - Frequent safety incidents
  • 5-6: Moderate Risk - Some safety challenges
  • 7-8: Low Risk - Generally safe environment
  • 9-10: Very Low Risk - Exceptionally safe neighborhood

In Canada the score maps the Crime Severity Index Statistics Canada publishes for each police service, which weighs every crime by the sentences courts give for it: an index of 30 or below scores 10 and 150 or above scores 0.

▸Curb appeal8/10Strong

A score from 0 to 10 reflecting how the area around this home looks from the street. Higher numbers indicate prettier, better-tended surroundings.

The score captures the AREA, not the specific home. It blends education and income of nearby residents, walkability, quietness, freedom from industrial smells, neighbourhood safety, and how much homes in the area typically list for. Two homes on the same street will usually score very similarly.

  • 0-2: Surrounding area presents poorly. Often near industry or in significant decline.
  • 3-4: Mixed surroundings. Less investment in upkeep, higher noise, or lower income.
  • 5-6: Average area. Typical suburban or mid-tier urban surroundings.
  • 7-8: Pleasant area. Quiet, walkable, well-tended streetscape.
  • 9-10: Premium area. Tree-lined heritage or established affluent surroundings.
▸Cell coverage7/10Strong

A comprehensive score measuring mobile network coverage in the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating better cellular connectivity.

This score reflects how good mobile service is in the area. It is not a signal-strength measurement at the property.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Minimal to no usable cell service
  • 3-4: Poor - Unreliable mobile connectivity
  • 5-6: Moderate - Inconsistent network performance
  • 7-8: Good - Reliable cell phone coverage
  • 9-10: Excellent - Top-tier mobile network quality

In Canada this is the newest technology of the licensed antenna sites near the home: 5G scores 10, LTE 8, 3G 5 and 2G 3.

▸Internet10/10Strong

A score from 0 to 10 reflecting how many strong internet options are available at this home and how fast they are. Higher numbers mean faster connections AND more choices.

Each fast service that reaches the home adds to the score: fibre, fast wired broadband and, where the country's records count them, fast fixed wireless and modern satellite service. A home with several options scores higher than a home with only one, because backup choices matter when the primary connection has an outage.

  • 10: Every fast service the country's records count reaches this home.
  • 8-9: Fibre reaches the home, alone or with other options, OR no fibre but most of the other top options are present.
  • 5-7: One strong wired or wireless option, alone or with one backup.
  • 3-4: A single decent option, or a couple of slower ones that handle email and browsing but struggle with streaming.
  • 1-2: Very low speed service or older high-latency satellite, suitable only for the lightest use.
  • 0: No broadband service of any kind available at the home.

In Canada this is the speeds the national broadband data gives the home and whether fibre reaches it. Fibre, wired broadband, fixed wireless and satellite each add points.

▸Quiet6/10Average

A comprehensive score measuring the noise levels and acoustic quality of an area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating a more peaceful and quiet environment.

This score helps residents and property seekers understand the sound landscape of a location, considering factors like traffic, industrial noise, proximity to loud areas, and overall acoustic comfort.

  • 0-2: Very Loud - Constant noise disruptions
  • 3-4: Noisy - Frequent sound disturbances
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some background noise
  • 7-8: Quiet - Peaceful with minimal interruptions
  • 9-10: Very Quiet - Nearly silent, exceptionally peaceful
▸Smell7/10Strong

A comprehensive score measuring the olfactory quality of an area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating a more pleasant-smelling environment.

This score helps residents and property seekers understand the smell landscape of a location, considering factors like industrial emissions, natural odors, and overall air quality.

  • 0-2: Very Unpleasant - Constant offensive odors
  • 3-4: Poor - Frequent smell disturbances
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some noticeable odors
  • 7-8: Good - Mostly clean-smelling environment
  • 9-10: Excellent - Pristine, fresh-smelling air
▸Traffic4/10Average

A comprehensive score measuring the traffic conditions in an area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating easier and more efficient transportation.

This score reflects how exposed the area is to busy major roads, with lighter, calmer local traffic scoring higher.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Extreme traffic congestion
  • 3-4: Poor - Significant transportation challenges
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some traffic issues
  • 7-8: Good - Relatively smooth traffic flow
  • 9-10: Excellent - Minimal congestion and easy commutes
▸Parking2/10Concerning

A comprehensive score measuring the parking convenience in an area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating easier and more accessible parking options.

This score reflects how plentiful parking supply tends to be in the area, with more abundant supply scoring higher.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Extreme parking challenges
  • 3-4: Poor - Significant parking difficulties
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some parking options available
  • 7-8: Good - Convenient parking access
  • 9-10: Excellent - Abundant and easy parking

In Canada this ranks the OpenStreetMap car and bicycle parking near each dissemination area.

▸Nature8/10Strong

A comprehensive score measuring the quality and accessibility of natural environments in the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more extensive and high-quality natural spaces.

This score reflects how much green space, such as parks, forests, and natural areas, is close to the area, with more nearby green space scoring higher.

  • 0-2: Very Limited - Almost no natural areas
  • 3-4: Poor - Minimal green spaces
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some natural environments
  • 7-8: Good - Abundant and diverse natural spaces
  • 9-10: Excellent - Exceptional green space and natural areas nearby
▸Education8/10Strong

A score measuring how accessible nearby schools are, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more schools within easy reach.

This score reflects how many schools are nearby and how close they are. It does not measure school ratings, test scores, or teaching quality.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Extremely limited educational options
  • 3-4: Poor - Significant educational challenges
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some educational resources
  • 7-8: Good - Strong academic opportunities
  • 9-10: Excellent - Exceptional educational environment

In Canada the schools are Statistics Canada's Open Database of Educational Facilities.

▸Family6/10Average

A comprehensive score measuring how suitable an area is for families, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more family-friendly environments.

This score reflects how common families with children are in the area, with more family-oriented neighbourhoods scoring higher.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Minimal family-friendly amenities
  • 3-4: Poor - Limited resources for families
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some family-oriented features
  • 7-8: Good - Strong family support and activities
  • 9-10: Excellent - Ideal environment for family living

In Canada this ranks the census share of households that are families with children in each dissemination area.

▸Retirement8/10Strong

A comprehensive score measuring how suitable an area is for retirees, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more retirement-friendly environments.

This score reflects how much the resident population of the area skews toward older, settled residents, with a stronger lean scoring higher.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Minimal retirement support
  • 3-4: Poor - Limited resources for seniors
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some retirement-friendly features
  • 7-8: Good - Strong support for retirees
  • 9-10: Excellent - Ideal environment for retirement living

In Canada this ranks the census share of residents aged 60 or more in each dissemination area.

▸Entertainment7/10Strong

A comprehensive score measuring the entertainment and recreational opportunities in the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more diverse and exciting local activities.

This score helps residents and property seekers understand the lifestyle and leisure potential of a specific location, considering factors like restaurants, venues, cultural attractions, and recreational options.

  • 0-2: Very Limited - Almost no entertainment options
  • 3-4: Poor - Very few recreational activities
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some local entertainment choices
  • 7-8: Good - Plenty of diverse entertainment
  • 9-10: Excellent - Vibrant, exciting local scene

In Canada this weighs Statistics Canada's cultural and art facilities at 0.4 and OpenStreetMap's nightlife at 0.6.

▸Food and drink7/10Strong

A comprehensive score measuring the quality and diversity of local food and drink options, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating a more exciting culinary environment.

This score helps residents and food enthusiasts understand the gastronomic potential of a location, considering factors like restaurant variety, cuisine types, dining experiences, and local food culture.

  • 0-2: Very Limited - Almost no dining options
  • 3-4: Poor - Very few interesting restaurants
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some local dining choices
  • 7-8: Good - Plenty of diverse food and drink options
  • 9-10: Excellent - Vibrant, world-class culinary scene
▸Shopping7/10Strong

A comprehensive score measuring the quality and accessibility of shopping options in the area, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more extensive and convenient shopping experiences.

This score helps residents and visitors understand the shopping landscape of a location, considering factors like store variety, proximity to retail centers, and overall shopping convenience.

  • 0-2: Very Poor - Almost no shopping options
  • 3-4: Poor - Limited retail choices
  • 5-6: Moderate - Some shopping variety
  • 7-8: Good - Diverse and convenient shopping
  • 9-10: Excellent - Exceptional shopping nearby

Comparable properties

First 10 of 46,958 comparables analyzed

These are nearby properties of the same type and similar size. The list price shown for each one is the last asking price we observed before it left the market, not its original listing price, which keeps it close to the estimated sale date and avoids distortion from homes that were listed too high at first and later reduced.

We rank each comparable by a match score that combines how far its price and size are from this home, with a lighter weight on distance. A lower score means a closer match, and the table shows the 10 lowest.

\[ \text{score} = \left(\frac{P - P_0}{P_0}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{A - A_0}{A_0}\right)^2 + 0.5\left(\frac{d}{5}\right)^2 \]

where \(P\) is the comparable's last known list price, \(P_0\) is this home's estimated list price, \(A\) and \(A_0\) are their interior areas, and \(d\) is the distance in kilometres.

PhotoAddressDistanceInteriorPrice / ft²List PriceSale Date (Estimated)
Comparable133 Riverview Court SE0.17 km1793 ft²$401$720,0002024-10-16
Comparable99 Riverside Close SE0.20 km1762 ft²$413$729,0002022-10-06
Comparable71 Riverside Close SE0.24 km1872 ft²$389$729,9002024-06-05
Comparable135 Riverside Close SE0.07 km1904 ft²$393$750,0002023-06-16
Comparable8 Riverside Crescent SE0.37 km1827 ft²$404$739,9002024-09-19
Comparable86 Riverside Close SE0.18 km1873 ft²$384$719,9002024-05-10
Comparable113 Riverview Court W0.23 km1869 ft²$385$720,0002026-09-07
Comparable12 Riverside Crescent SE0.38 km1827 ft²$396$724,9002024-12-09
Comparable199 Riverside Close SE0.15 km1721 ft²$450$775,0002024-07-11
Comparable33 Riverside Crescent SE0.43 km1779 ft²$432$769,9002025-06-03

Glossary of terms

AVM (automated valuation model)

A program that estimates property values using data and statistics.

Confidence score

How reliable the model thinks its estimate is. Higher is better.

$$\text{Confidence Score} = 100 - \text{Median MAPE}$$

100 minus median MAPE. If median MAPE is 8%, confidence is 92%.

Training vs testing data

The model learns from training data and is evaluated on held-out testing data. Testing scores reflect real-world performance.

R-squared (coefficient of determination)

How well the model explains property values. 0 to 1, where closer to 1 is better.

$$R^2 = 1 - \frac{SS_{res}}{SS_{tot}}$$

SSres = sum of squared residuals. SStot = total sum of squares.

Mean absolute error (MAE)

Average prediction error in dollars. Lower is better.

$$MAE = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} |y_i - \hat{y}_i|$$

yi = actual, ŷi = predicted, n = count.

Root mean square error (RMSE)

Like MAE but penalizes larger errors more. Lower is better.

$$RMSE = \sqrt{\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} (y_i - \hat{y}_i)^2}$$

MAPE (mean absolute percentage error)

Average error as a percentage. Lower is better.

$$MAPE = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left|\frac{y_i - \hat{y}_i}{y_i}\right| \times 100\%$$

Median MAPE

Middle of all percentage errors. Less swayed by outliers than MAPE.

Within X% accuracy

Share of predictions within X% of the actual value. Higher is better.

$$\text{Within X%} = \frac{\text{Count of } |\text{error}| \leq X\% \text{ of actual}}{\text{Total predictions}} \times 100\%$$

Mean bias

Whether the model averages high (positive) or low (negative). Closer to zero is better.

$$\text{Mean Bias} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} (\hat{y}_i - y_i)$$

Median bias

Middle prediction error. Less affected by outliers than mean bias.

Over-prediction rate

Share of predictions higher than the actual value.

$$\text{Over-prediction Rate} = \frac{\text{Count of } \hat{y}_i > y_i}{\text{Total predictions}} \times 100\%$$

A balanced model is near 50%.

Under-prediction rate

Share of predictions lower than the actual value.

$$\text{Under-prediction Rate} = \frac{\text{Count of } \hat{y}_i < y_i}{\text{Total predictions}} \times 100\%$$

Percentile error

Error distribution. '90th percentile' means 90% of predictions were more accurate.

Percentile % error

Same as percentile error but as a percentage of the actual value.

Forecast standard deviation

How much predictions vary from the average prediction. Lower is more consistent.

$$\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} (\hat{y}_i - \bar{y})^2}$$

Coefficient of variation

Prediction consistency relative to average value. Lower is better.

$$CV = \frac{\text{Standard Deviation}}{\text{Mean}} \times 100$$

Comparable properties

Similar nearby properties used to estimate value.

Important information

Valuations come from machine learning models using comparable listings, market trends, and location. Use as a reference only.

Accuracy is measured against a held-out benchmark set. Unique property features and current market conditions not captured in the model may affect true value.

For investment or purchase decisions, get a professional appraisal from a licensed appraiser.

This report is not a formal appraisal and should not be the sole basis for financial decisions.

Houski does not offer AVM insurance, value protection, or any accuracy guarantee, and accepts no liability for any difference between this estimate and an actual listing price, sale price, or appraisal. See our terms of service for full details.